Samuel Cohen – Neutron Nukes Secrets https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/samuel-cohen-neutron-nukes-secrets/
The Nuclear Threat That Doesn’t Exist – or Does It?
by Sam Cohen and Joe Douglass March 11, 2003
【Pure Fusion Warheads The small tactical battlefield neutron bomb is the closest kin to a pure-fusion device.
The principle difference is that in a pure-fusion device, the plutonium fission component is entirely eliminated.
The pure-fusion device relies on the same deuterium-tritium mixture to create its burst of high-energy neutrons, but is designed to accomplish this “burn” without the use of any fissionable material. Thus, while still packing a neutron wallop, its explosive yield – the part that does the most physical damage – is much smaller because it lacks the fission component.
What little explosive yield remains can be as little as one hundredth the size of the small tactical battlefield neutron bomb.】
●DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LOW-YIELD NUCLEAR WEAPONS
by Sam Cohen and Joe Douglass March 9, 2003
【To understand the reasons behind this concern, consider the small sizes into which very respectable yields can be packaged.
Warheads whose weight lies in the 30 to 150 pound range can “have yields as low as 50 tons (high explosive equivalent) to tens of kilotons, several times the size of the first nuclear weapons that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The most available warheads and easiest to manage would be in the 100 ton to 1 or 2 kiloton range.
Insofar as size is concerned, an implosion nuclear warhead could be as small as a soccer ball and weigh less than 50 pounds. 】
Just some nuke facts from Mr. Neutron Bomb… Cohen retitled the book in its final printing, “F!CK YOU, Mr. President!”
Cohen points out that the neutron bomb doesn’t have the collateral damage of fallout, blast and heat effects that occurred in Hiroshima, but enhanced neutron flash radiation: `in about a thousandth of a second it will seriously irradiate enemy soldiers (in tanks, self-propelled artillery vehicles, armored personnel carriers, in field bunkers, and most other places where they may be) out to a distance of about half to three-quarters of a mile for a warhead yield of a kiloton… Roughly half will die, most rather quickly from shock to the central nervous system. … What doesn’t it do? Well, for start-offs, when the war is over the civilian areas — villages, towns, cities — will be in just about the shape they were in before it started. There will be no lingering radioactivity [residual doses from neutron induced activity in soil are insignificant compared to the flash dose of neutrons, and it decays quickly as in Hiroshima] prevent occupation of these areas; in fact, they can be reentered almost immediately.
Also a nice read…
DECAY RATE. The decay rate of radioactive
materials from a single weapon can be determined with fair accuracy by using the ABCM1A1 radiac calculator, which is a component of the M28A1 calculator set or by using newly developed automated aids. To make a quick estimate of fallout decay, analysts decrease the intensity by a factor of ten as the time after the burst increases by multiples of seven. For example, a dose rate of 50 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst decays to 5 cGy/hour in 7 hours and to about 0.50 cGy/hour in 49 hours. Boundaries for significant areas of newly deposited fallout are based on dose rates. For short-term (24-hour) occupancy of an area, the dose rate is 20 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst. For longer term occupancy, the dose rate is 10 cGy/hour at1 hour after the burst. FM 3-12 and FM 3-22 contain specific details of fallout prediction, decay, and total dose calculations.
Craters caused by surface and shallow subsurface bursts will be contaminated by neutron-induced radiation and residual radioactive fission products. The activity in and around the crater can be estimated one hour after detonation, and the decay rate established as discussed above. http://nige.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fm101-31-1.pdf
Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons
Andre Gsponer – also a nice read
February 11, 2008
Military effectiveness and collateral effects http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6254
Photo: 1993 WTC ‘truck bomb’ residue. danni-alle-fondamenta-162197
Bombs in the WTC Buildings Proves Nothing to Racist Fascist Bigots. http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm
US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm
Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm
Update: Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ Updated Broken Links
’9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/9-11-fake-video-stars-the-j-star-clones-why-covert-operations-cointel-must-have-fake-video-and-no-planes/
Why Covert Ops Must Have `Fake’ Video
No Windows on Flight 175 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related
Ed Ward, MD